Main Discussion - Norwich City

Topic has 44 replies.
Print Search Sort Posts:

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

PUPs united HermanYes [Y]
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

I think we should have a NPP (Nonsense Per Post) rating just above the post count. I'm sure Big Vince would win the pound for pound category contest with his 32 posts which have been made over the last 5 years.


   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

Bump
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

Memory
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

They'll be calling for reinstatement of banned members soon!!!
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

thumb image
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

Funny how Lincoln jumps in immediately in support. Knocking the club solidly then and now.
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

Only a Delia supporting numpty would dredge this up in a desperate attempt to justify the continuation of the status quo.

That post was accurate for the time when it was written. Times change and arguments change over time and so history gets re-written. McNasty is thus now to be judged over the whole period of his tenure, good and bad.

Hughton turned out to be the wrong choice, although it seemed a good appointment at the time. Lambert was a complete unknown who came good in a big way. Neil had an instant impact, but got found out at Newcastle and was never the same thereafter. This is the nature of football. It is an inexact science.

McNasty overall tried to make the best decisions based on who was available, what their track record was, what their experience was and whether it was relevant to the needs of Norwich City at the level they were at at the time. So with McNasty at least the right boxes were being ticked in the appointment process. When the Suffolk Socialists have been left to their own devices all the wrong boxes have been ticked and so all their appointments, bar Worthy, have failed. Given that McNasty was taken out of the appointment process with Adams, his strike rate of 2 successes in 3 appointments is vastly superior to anything compared to the Suffolk Socialists.
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

Vinny, you're either part of the people you were looking for or you're not....
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

Okay let's have a poll to settle the matter:

All those in favour of Chase/McNasty CLICK HERE

All those in favour of Suffolk Socialism CLICK HERE
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

HERE

Did you click both Vinny?
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

You were right about one thing though Vinnie-the 3 Europeans Lambert signed (De Laet, Ayala and Pacheco) were all rubbish.
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

 Fuzzar wrote:
Funny how Lincoln jumps in immediately in support. Knocking the club solidly then and now.
 "Knocking the club solidly then and now". Brilliant; Lincoln's unwritten signature on his every post Big Smile [:D]
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

"Given that McNasty was taken out of the appointment process with Adams"

Err where is your evidence for this statement othere than blind prejudice
   Report  

Re: McNasty: The Fall of.........

"Given that McNasty was taken out of the appointment process with Adams"

Err where is your evidence for this statement othere than blind prejudice."

There was something array about the whole thing ... certainly not a football decision, imo.

I consider it the most ridiculous decision the club has made in all my years of supporting. The timing made us a laughing stock and Hughton should have been sacked earlier or at the end of the season.

He might even have kept us up.The appointment of the novice Adams virtually amounted to throwing the towel in with, what, six games still left of the season.
   Report